Free antivirus for mac os x 10.9
![free antivirus for mac os x 10.9 free antivirus for mac os x 10.9](http://download.bitdefender.com/resources/themes/draco/images/screenshots/en/mac/avm_scrn1_big.png)
Private Mac users can depend on the internal security systems of the current OS X.
![free antivirus for mac os x 10.9 free antivirus for mac os x 10.9](https://images.sftcdn.net/images/t_app-cover-l,f_auto/p/2088fa52-9b27-11e6-9591-00163ec9f5fa/2785009571/avast-screenshot.png)
And this despite the fact that most of the protection packages require payment of an annual license. There are only additional protection modules, such as a personal firewall, child protection, a backup function or encryption tools on selective products. Not even half the packages throw in a safe-browsing function for the user. ESET, G Data and Trend Micro an anti-phishing tool. In addition to the normal security functions, the packages offer only selective additional functions.
#Free antivirus for mac os x 10.9 software#
None of the security packages sounded a false alarm here.įor this test, the security software had a somewhat easier job under Mac than under Windows, as the volume of available software is considerably smaller. Among them, for example, were tools such as the VLC Media Player, Open Office or Java, for instance. While protection was active, 100 popular software packages from the Mac App Store were each installed. Identification friend or foeĪll the system watchdogs were tested for false positives. Prior to that, a security solution thus slowed down the copying routine by a maximum of 3.6 seconds – that's not anything the user would notice in everyday use.įar above this threshold were the packages from Microworld with 40.4 seconds and Trend Micro tested multiple times at 470.3 seconds instead of 17.2 – that is a 27-fold time lag. Of the initial 16 solutions, with 20.8 seconds the package from Intego marked the threshold to the programs that slowed down the system. The strong detection package from G Data slowed down the system slightly more: 19.1 seconds. Regardless of their flawless detection performance, Bitdefender and Norman hardly slowed down the system at all: 17.5 and 18.1 seconds respectively were measured during copying. Half the tested products only slowed down the system by a factor between 1.5 and 10 percent. Afterwards, all the products were installed, the copy routine was repeated and the time was clocked. In order to measure the burden posed by system watchdogs, the laboratory measured the time it took to copy over 7 GB of data on the reference system: 17.2 seconds. The biggest problem with antivirus applications on the Mac is that they are a drag on the system. The weakest product from Webroot thus only caught every fifth intruder. Also in the on-access test, the four products only achieved 21.4 to 50 percent. In the on-demand test, detection was only between 19.7 and 54.7 percent. The last four products from Symantec, Trend Micro, McAfee and Webroot exhibited very poor results. In the on-access test, the scores were only between 70.2 and 100 percent. This is followed by a wide midfield with 10 products that achieved between 82.1 and 100 percent in the on-demand test. Only the packages from Bitdefender, G Data and Norman were able to complete both parts each with 100 percent detection. In this case, the watchdog must respond and block access to the infected file. In doing so, an additional 84 infected files in the system were copied into another folder. In the second part, the on-access test, the quality of the background antivirus watchdog was inspected. This is the normal scanning routine of security tools for malware. In the first part of the test, 117 specimens of malware targeting the Mac were inspected in the so-called on-demand test. In addition, the features of the protection packages were listed.
![free antivirus for mac os x 10.9 free antivirus for mac os x 10.9](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-3WwdwbojTAk/UgEZM2eq0lI/AAAAAAAABE0/EqJqzDykavE/s1600/Best+Antivirus+for+Mac+OS+X.jpg)
18 Security suites for Mac put to the testįor the maximum protection under OS X 10.9, the AV-TEST lab inspected 18 currently available Internet security suites in terms of their protection function, system load and false positives. An opinion that persists to this day, except probably among the some 700,000 Flashback victims. Up to that time, there was a consensus that an antivirus application for a Mac was merely ballast. The Flashback attack of 2012 caught many users flat-footed, and over 700,000 Macs were infected in a flash. USB sticks, CDs or DVDs, however, are not inspected. Xprotect, for example, checks the mail and browser downloads. To be sure, since OS X 10.7 or 10.8 there are some good internal security systems such as Gatekeeper, Sandbox and Xprotect. Everyone says: Mac OS X can protect itself